The research that decides halal or haram, on any coin.
223 cryptocurrencies and 22 tokenized stocks are already screened and published on this site. The AI screener is for everything else — you name an asset, it applies the same framework and returns the same report, with the reasoning shown.
5 full runs a month, free. No card.
What this actually solves
The coin you hold isn't on anyone's list
Every halal crypto list covers the same few hundred majors. The moment you look at something smaller — a new L2, a gaming token, whatever launched last month — you get nothing back. That is where most people give up and guess.
The screener runs on any asset, covered or not.
A one-word verdict you cannot check
"Halal." On what basis? Most screeners return a label and no reasoning, which asks you to take a religious ruling on trust from a website. If you cannot see the reasoning, you cannot tell a careful answer from a guess.
Every line of the report states the evidence behind it.
"Is it halal" is really several questions
Buying and holding a token, staking it, and lending it out are three different transactions with three different rulings. A single verdict on the asset collapses them, so people stake something they were only cleared to hold.
Verdicts are given per activity, not per asset.
Doing it properly takes a week you don't have
Reading a whitepaper, tracing where the revenue comes from, checking whether the protocol has lending built in, finding whether the team is real — that is genuine research, and by the time you finish, the reason you were looking has passed.
The same ground gets covered in a single run.
What the screen does
Three layers, not one
The infrastructure an asset runs on, the application it serves, and the asset itself are screened separately, and a failure at any single layer fails the asset. A clean token on a chain whose entire economy is lending does not pass because the token looks clean.
Property status, then the money
Before any ratio is calculated, the token is tested against the conditions for recognised property (māl): that it presently exists, has an ascertainable supply, can be held and transferred, and carries a genuine lawful use. Only then do the AAOIFI revenue-purity and debt thresholds apply.
Fundamental analysis in the same report
A permissible asset can still be a bad one. Each report carries a separate fundamental section — what the project does, where the strength is, where the vulnerabilities are, and who it competes with — so the Shariah verdict is not mistaken for a recommendation.
A framework you can read before you trust it
The screen is not our private opinion of the fiqh. It implements a published framework, set out in full on the methodology page with its sources named, so you can disagree with the reasoning specifically rather than in general.
What it is not
It is not a fatwa, and it is not a scholar. The model does not decide the fiqh — the framework is fixed and published before any asset is screened, and its job is to research an asset and apply stated rules to what it finds. Final religious authority rests with a qualified scholar.
It is not investment advice either. A verdict of Halal says an asset passed a compliance screen. It says nothing about whether buying it is a good idea, which is why the fundamental section sits in the same report and frequently disagrees with the enthusiasm around a token.
And it is not infallible. Reports are dated, sources are shown, and the reasoning is laid out line by line precisely so that you can check it and tell us when it is wrong. Report a verdict you disagree with.
Frequently asked questions
What is the ShariaQuant AI screener?+
It is a research tool that applies a documented Shariah screening framework to any cryptocurrency you name, and returns a full report: a verdict per activity, the reasoning and evidence behind it, scores for Shariah compliance, project legitimacy and team, and a separate fundamental analysis. It runs on assets we have not covered yet, which is the main reason to use it rather than the existing list.
Is the AI making the religious ruling?+
No. The framework is fixed, published and human-authored — the model's job is research and application, not deciding the fiqh. It gathers and organises facts about an asset and applies stated rules to them. Where the framework leaves a question open, the report says so rather than resolving it silently. This is analysis, not a fatwa, and no scholar has reviewed the individual verdicts the tool produces.
How is this different from a halal crypto list?+
A list can only answer for assets somebody already screened. The screener answers for the asset you actually hold, including one listed last week. It also gives separate rulings for holding, staking and lending, which a list cannot express in one row.
Do I have to pay to use it?+
No. Every account gets 5 full research runs a month free until 20 August. From 21 August 2026, new accounts get 1 full run at signup instead, and paid plans raise that to 10 or 20 runs a month. Every Shariah verdict we publish stays free to read in full either way, and the screening itself is identical on every plan.
Can the verdict on an asset change?+
Yes, and it should. A project that adds a lending product, changes its revenue mix or alters its tokenomics is a different asset to screen. Reports carry the date they were produced, and re-running a screening is how you check whether anything has moved.
Screen the coin you actually hold
5 full research runs a month, free, on any asset. If you need more than that, the plans and credits page sets out what each tier raises it to.
Verdicts on this page are not opinions issued by ShariaQuant. Each is the output of a documented screening methodology applied to researched facts, with the evidence behind every ruling shown on the asset's own report. Financial thresholds follow the AAOIFI screening standard. Read the methodology. This is analysis, not a fatwa — final religious authority rests with a qualified scholar.