Is Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) Halal or Haram?
SUMMARY
The Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET/ASI) operates a permissible decentralized AI infrastructure network. However, the token is rated Doubtful because the ERC-20 contract retains a discretionary mint function, and the share of non-compliant revenue reaching holders could not be established due to missing data.
Holder risks
Someone other than you holds a power over this coin. It puts what you hold at risk, so read it alongside the verdict.
Transfers can be paused for everyone
No one can freeze a single holder, but a party can halt all transfers of this coin at once.
“{"inputs":[],"name":"pause","outputs":[],"stateMutability":"nonpayable","type":"function"}”
Quote checked againstetherscan.io
A central party can create new coins at will
New supply can be issued outside any fixed rule or cap, which can dilute what you hold.
“{"inputs":[{"internalType":"address","name":"account","type":"address"},{"internalType":"uint256","name":"amount","type":"uint256"}],"name":"mint","outputs":[],"stateMutability":"nonpayable","type":"function"}”
Quote checked againstetherscan.io
Why this one is not a clear yes or no
Doubtful means the evidence did not settle it, not that nobody looked. The methodology sets out what every asset is checked against, where the line sits, and why we stop short of calling something permissible when the answer is not there.
Read the methodology Or learn halal investing with our free lessons. No card needed.Verdict by Activity
How you can hold and use FET
Buy & Hold
Holding is Doubtful because the token contract retains a discretionary mint function, and the share of non-compliant revenue could not be established.
Native Staking
OptionalNative PoS network-security staking is permissible, funded partially by inflation and transaction fees.
What the screen checked
Shariah Analysis
Infrastructure — where it runs
PassedThe asset runs on its own Layer 1 (ASI Chain), Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, and Cosmos, which are neutral, general-purpose networks.
Application — what it does
PassedThe project provides decentralized AI infrastructure and compute marketplaces, with no exposure to interest-based lending, gambling, or haram industries.
Asset — what you own
PassedThe token is used for network transaction fees, AI services, governance, and native PoS network-security staking. Staking rewards are funded partially by inflation.
Property Status (Māl)
CautionThe ERC-20 contract contains a discretionary mint function accessible by an admin role, and a global pause function. Additionally, the token's genuine lawful use could not be confirmed due to a dead link.
Revenue Purity
CautionRevenue reaches holders through transaction fees and block rewards, but the share of non-compliant revenue could not be established due to a dead link.
Legitimacy & Security
whitepaper
PassedOfficial documentation, vision paper, and tokenomics are available and verified.
project audits
CautionThe notes mention audit reports but do not provide evidence of a completed audit by a named independent auditor.
social presence
PassedThe project is highly visible and backed by established entities in the crypto-AI space.
Team & Ecosystem
team background
PassedThe project is formed by the merger of established entities including Fetch.ai, SingularityNET, Ocean Protocol, and CUDOS.
Detailed Shariah Report
The Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET/ASI) provides a decentralized infrastructure and marketplace for artificial intelligence, combining autonomous agents, data exchange, and distributed compute. Its native token is used to pay for AI services, cover network transaction fees, participate in governance, and secure the network through staking.
The Shariah compliance of a crypto asset is evaluated across three layers: the underlying infrastructure, the application's business activity, and the asset itself. A failure at any one layer fails the whole asset. The Artificial Superintelligence Alliance operates on neutral, general-purpose networks (its own ASI Chain, Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, and Cosmos) and provides permissible decentralized AI services without exposure to interest or gambling. However, simply buying and holding the FET/ASI token is rated Doubtful due to issues at the asset qualification and revenue purity layers. To qualify as recognized wealth (Mal), a digital asset must represent an exclusive, protocol-recognized right of control that is ascertainable, transferable, and carries a lawful use. While the token is transferable, its smart contract retains a centralized, discretionary mint function and a global pause function, which compromises exclusive holder control and supply ascertainability. Furthermore, while revenue from transaction fees reaches holders, the exact share of potentially non-compliant revenue could not be established due to missing data. Conversely, the opt-in mechanism of native Proof-of-Stake (PoS) staking is considered Halal, as it secures the network and is funded by permissible inflation and transaction fees, though the underlying token itself remains Doubtful to hold.
- The project operates in the permissible sector of decentralized AI infrastructure, data exchange, and distributed compute.
- The underlying networks (ASI Chain, Ethereum, BSC, Cosmos) are neutral, general-purpose infrastructures, and hosting other applications does not taint the native asset.
- The token has clear utility for paying network transaction fees (gas) and accessing AI services.
- Native Proof-of-Stake (PoS) staking is a permissible, opt-in mechanism to secure the network, funded by inflation and transaction fees.
- !The ERC-20 token contract contains a discretionary mint function accessible by an admin, which compromises the ascertainability of the supply and exclusive holder control.
- !The contract includes a global pause function that can halt all transfers, further limiting true ownership rights.
- !Revenue reaches token holders through transaction fees and block rewards, but the exact share of non-compliant revenue could not be verified due to missing documentation.
- !The composition and yield strategies of the project's treasury are not publicly disclosed, meaning it is unknown if the foundation earns interest on its reserves.
As the exact share of non-compliant revenue reaching token holders could not be established due to missing data, a precise purification calculation cannot be provided. Investors holding this Doubtful asset should exercise caution and consult a qualified scholar regarding any staking rewards or transaction fees received.
The Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET/ASI) offers a fundamentally permissible decentralized AI marketplace and compute network. However, the token is rated Doubtful for holding because the contract retains centralized minting and pausing powers, and the proportion of impure revenue reaching holders could not be verified. While the native staking mechanism itself is structurally sound, the underlying concerns regarding the token's contract and revenue transparency warrant caution. Final religious authority rests with a qualified Shariah scholar.
How this verdict was reached
This is not an opinion issued by ShariaQuant. It is the output of a documented screening methodology applied to researched facts about Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET), and every row above states the specific evidence that drove it — so the reasoning can be examined rather than taken on trust.
The framework screens three layers — the infrastructure an asset runs on, the application it serves, and the asset itself — and separately tests whether the token qualifies as recognised property (māl): that it presently exists, has an ascertainable supply, can be held and transferred, and carries a genuine lawful use. A failure at any single layer fails the asset.
Revenue-purity thresholds follow the AAOIFI screening standard: non-compliant income below 5% of revenue is tolerated and purified, while 5% or above fails the screen.
The framework follows published scholarship rather than in-house opinion. Treating a digital asset as a right (ḥaqq) that becomes recognised property (māl) only on stated conditions follows “Is Crypto Halal? The Definitive Shariah Guide to Crypto and Digital Assets” by Mufti Faraz Adam (Amanah Advisors, 2026), which reproduces the conditions identified by Mufti Taqi Usmani. Financial thresholds follow the AAOIFI screening standard. The rulings we track are collected in the fatwa library.
AAOIFI has not reviewed, approved or endorsed this report or ShariaQuant, and no scholar named in our methodology has reviewed this individual verdict. This is analysis, not a fatwa — final religious authority rests with a qualified scholar.
This is an AI research platform and the screening engine is under active development. We keep improving how facts are gathered and checked, and a report is re-issued in full when an asset is screened again rather than amended in place.
Check this yourself
Each finding below is quoted word for word from the document it came from, and every quote was checked against that document before this verdict was issued. Open the link and read the sentence in place — you do not have to take ours for it.
3 of 5 decisive claims verified against their source, 2 withdrawn.
- What the holder legally ownsQuote verified
“The FET (ASI) token is the primary cryptocurrency for the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance.”
superintelligence.io - Who can freeze a holder's balanceQuote verified
“{"inputs":[],"name":"pause","outputs":[],"stateMutability":"nonpayable","type":"function"}”
etherscan.io - Who can create new supplyQuote verified
“{"inputs":[{"internalType":"address","name":"account","type":"address"},{"internalType":"uint256","name":"amount","type":"uint256"}],"name":"mint","outputs":[],"stateMutability":"nonpayable","type":"function"}”
etherscan.io
2 further findings were withdrawn before this verdict, because the quoted wording could not be confirmed in the document it was attributed to. Those points were treated as unknown rather than relied on.
Is Artificial Superintelligence Alliance a serious project?
Permissible is not the same as good. This is the research behind that second question — what Artificial Superintelligence Alliance is actually for, who is paying for it, what is already built, and what would have to go wrong.
Research on the project, not advice on the trade. A high fundamental score is not a recommendation to buy, and it says nothing about whether the asset is permissible — that is the Shariah verdict, and it is free.
How Artificial Superintelligence Alliance ranks against its peers
The Shariah verdict tells you whether you may own Artificial Superintelligence Alliance. This tells you what you would be holding — worked out by a fixed formula from public market data, and compared only against assets of the same kind.
A ranking of how solid an asset is against its peers, not a forecast of what it will do next and not investment advice. A permissible asset can rank badly, and a badly ranked asset can still rise.
Asked alongside this
Short answers from the ShariaQuant team.
Still have questions about Artificial Superintelligence Alliance?
Ask in the community. Members and the team answer, usually the same day.
Both are free. No card needed.